Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2011

Abstract

Anselmian theism holds that there necessarily exists a being, God, who is essentially unsurpassable in power, knowledge, goodness, and wisdom. This being is also understood to be the creator and sustainer of all that is. In contemporary analytic philosophy of religion, this role is generally understood as follows: God surveys the array of possible worlds, and in his wisdom selects exactly one for actualization, based on its axiological properties. In this paper, I discuss an under-appreciated challenge for this account of the Anselmian God’s selection of a world. In particular, I urge that there are failures of comparability between various possible worlds, and I argue that, given certain assumptions, these failures threaten the rationality of God’s choice of a world. To the extent that rationality is deemed necessary for unsurpassability, this result also challenges the core Anselmian notion that God is an unsurpassable being.

Comments

This paper appears in the International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (2011): pp.91-102.

The published version can be found online at:

http://www.springerlink.com/content/l4t7844jp358n071/fulltext.pdf .


Download

Included in

Philosophy Commons

Share

COinS